Amanda Sefton (
xp_daytripper) wrote2005-05-25 08:35 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I, apparently, suck.
Just got a batch of links from my mate Charlie. Seems the Burning Times is another one of those myths, like that Pope Joan. Yes, witches [1] were tried and burned and tortured, but it wasn't a wholescale genocide sort of thing. At least, not during the times courts kept records. Of course, that only goes back to the age of the printing press and doesn't cover what happened to the Druids when Britain was invaded by the Romans, but then again, unless I work out how to summon the ghost of Magic Users Past, that's probably just another myth too.
So, you're all right, I'm wrong (again) and I'm going to stop attempting to be clever and go play with Meggan.
Edit: The links, since you lot obviously don't understand the words "I got it wrong":
http://www.cog.org/witch_hunt.html
http://www.wiccaweb.com/suck_misconceptions.php
http://www.religioustolerance.org/wic_burn.htm
http://www.religioustolerance.org/wic_burn1.htm
There.
Edit 2: [1] or perfectly non-magically adept people who for whatever reason were called witches.
So, you're all right, I'm wrong (again) and I'm going to stop attempting to be clever and go play with Meggan.
Edit: The links, since you lot obviously don't understand the words "I got it wrong":
http://www.cog.org/witch_hunt.html
http://www.wiccaweb.com/suck_misconceptions.php
http://www.religioustolerance.org/wic_burn.htm
http://www.religioustolerance.org/wic_burn1.htm
There.
Edit 2: [1] or perfectly non-magically adept people who for whatever reason were called witches.
no subject
Catseye does not understand. Catseye used that Google thing and many of the pages say that the people who were hurt were not actually witches but just accused of that because it was a good way to find people who were Christian but that the Church thought were heretics. Yes, Catseye knows what "heretic" means now. :p
And Catseye also read that they didn't torture or kill them that often and it was over several centuries and that the Inquisition still exists today and is called the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and there is still a lot for Catseye to read.
What? Catseye got curious!
no subject
no subject
no subject
Cats know everything! Nyah!
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
if you want to vent, I'm here, okay? even if I am a-called heathen.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Catseye thinks someone is being pissy tonight. :p
But if that pissy someone would rather not get more information and sulk about being wrong instead, Catseye can read up on things for her own sake just as easily. Pfff.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Court records go back plenty further than the printing press. They're just hand-written is all.
Wasn't Britain colonised by the Romans? Who weren't Christian and generally fonder of not giving a damn about religions that didn't rouse-rabble?
Oooh, except that I see this one site is blaming the Burning Times on the Inquisition. Yeah, that's about as inaccurate as you can get.
no subject
no subject
Links are good though. I like links.
no subject
Morever, when it's used as collective history, it shapes the development of individuals and groups whether it's accurate down to the last name and date or as far from being accurate as possible. We all see the past through a filter of our own perceptions, and seeing the filter is as important as the names and dates.
That being said, I remember being more than a little surprised when I studied the Roman Inquisition back in university and found out just how... tolerant it could be.
no subject
no subject
It is possible, in some cases - not all - to know what happened with a reasonable degree of certainty. It's next to impossible to know for sure why something happened. It's also possible to overcompensate, and just because history is inaccurate doesn't mean it's not influential on a present course of events. The ethnographers who looked into the question of race in the early medieval period and explored precisely what they thought it meant to be 'Germanic' certainly weren't expecting nationalist theorists (and later, the Nazis) to pick it up and run with it to new and scary places.
...good God, I'm lecturing. Someone stop me.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
And speaking of history...
They're probably gone now, disappeared into some academic's to-do list somewhere. If not used to heat the old family home.
Manuel
Re: And speaking of history...
Mine was a very, very old family.
no subject
Or wait, did you mean the Roman Catholics?
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
If I really wanted to get started, I'd be telling you about how the medieval period was actually fundamentally more tolerant than the period of the Renaissance and Reformation. So much for the 'Dark Ages'.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
Good thing I already know I'm going to fail my finals, isn't it?
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I'll spot you and the bit a coke if you want to commiserate.
no subject
no subject
Never mind, we'll be right down. Thanks, Remy. Escape good.
no subject
(no subject)